Regulation Tracker / United States (state)
California Rule of Court 10.430 and Standard 10.80: Generative AI use by courts
Judicial Council of California · California
last revised 2025-09-01last verified 2026-09-031 version
Court ruleIn forceConfidentialityVerification dutyDisclosureRecord-keeping
Rule 10.430 of the California Rules of Court, effective 1 September 2025, requires every California court that permits generative AI use by judicial officers or staff to adopt a use policy by 15 December 2025. Policies must address confidentiality, bias, human review of output, and disclosure when public-facing content is fully AI-generated. Standard 10.80 offers a model policy.
- Applies to
- judges, court-staff
- Effective
- 01 Sept 2025
- Current version
- Original · 01 Sept 2025
- Last verified
- 03 Sept 2026
- Official text
- courts.ca.gov/cms/rules/index/ten/rule10_430
What the document requires
- Courts permitting generative AI must adopt a written use policy by 15 December 2025.
- Policies must prohibit entering confidential, personal or sealed information into public tools.
- Staff must review AI output for accuracy and bias before use.
- Public-facing written or visual content generated entirely by AI must be disclosed as such.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2025-09-01 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "California Rule of Court 10.430 and Standard 10.80: Generative AI use by courts" (Judicial Council of California, Original, 2025-09-01), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-state/ca-rule-of-court-10-430-generative-ai (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (state)
- Connecticut Judicial Branch, Committee on Artificial Intelligence in the Connecticut Legal System: Final Report · Connecticut Judicial Branch
- Connecticut Practice Book Section 4-9: Generative Artificial Intelligence Compliance · Connecticut Judicial Branch
- In re Amendments to Article V, Rule 1.1 of the Supreme Court Rules (Professional Conduct) and Adoption of Interim Generative AI Guidelines · RI Supreme Court
- Ohio Ethics Guide: Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers and Judicial Officers · Ohio Board of Professional Conduct
- 22 NYCRR Part 161 — Use of Artificial Intelligence Technology · NY Unified Court System
- In re Amendments to Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.515 (generative AI), SC2026-0673 · Florida Supreme Court