Regulation Tracker / United States (state)
Arizona Code of Judicial Administration 1-509: Use of Generative AI Technology and Large Language Models
Supreme Court of Arizona · Arizona
last revised 2025-01-29last verified 2026-09-032 versions
Court ruleIn forceCompetenceConfidentialityVerification duty
Section 1-509 of the Arizona Code of Judicial Administration, adopted by the Supreme Court of Arizona on 30 October 2024 and amended 29 January 2025, governs how the state judicial branch uses generative AI and large language models. It sets approval, confidentiality, verification and accountability requirements for judges and court employees rather than for litigants.
- Applies to
- judges, court-staff
- Effective
- 30 Oct 2024
- Current version
- Amended (Administrative Order 2025-24) · 29 Jan 2025
- Last verified
- 03 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Applies to all Arizona judicial branch personnel using generative AI in their work.
- Confidential, sealed and personally identifiable information may not be entered into public tools.
- Users must review and verify AI output; AI cannot substitute for judicial decision-making.
- Courts must approve tools and maintain an inventory of AI use.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amended (Administrative Order 2025-24)current | 2025-01-29 | Amendments to the original section adopted by Administrative Order 2025-24. | official |
| Original (Administrative Order 2024-207) | 2024-10-30 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Arizona Code of Judicial Administration 1-509: Use of Generative AI Technology and Large Language Models" (Supreme Court of Arizona, Amended (Administrative Order 2025-24), 2025-01-29), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-state/az-acja-1-509-generative-ai (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (state)
- Connecticut Judicial Branch, Committee on Artificial Intelligence in the Connecticut Legal System: Final Report · Connecticut Judicial Branch
- Connecticut Practice Book Section 4-9: Generative Artificial Intelligence Compliance · Connecticut Judicial Branch
- In re Amendments to Article V, Rule 1.1 of the Supreme Court Rules (Professional Conduct) and Adoption of Interim Generative AI Guidelines · RI Supreme Court
- Ohio Ethics Guide: Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers and Judicial Officers · Ohio Board of Professional Conduct
- 22 NYCRR Part 161 — Use of Artificial Intelligence Technology · NY Unified Court System
- In re Amendments to Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.515 (generative AI), SC2026-0673 · Florida Supreme Court