Council of State, Third Section: parameters for AI use in proceedings and disciplinary referral
Council of State (Consejo de Estado, Seccion Tercera)
last revised 2026-06-09last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
Judgment (guidance)In forceVerification duty
map categories:Sanctions for AI misuseDuty to verify AI outputAI barred from deciding cases
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
In an extraordinary unification appeal citing rulings the Court's reporting office could not locate, the Council of State held that AI may only assist with searching and organising information, that all AI output requires human verification, that adjudication is non-delegable, and that AI-detection tools are too unreliable to carry judicial weight. It referred the lawyer for discipline.
- Applies to
- lawyers, judges, parties
- Effective
- 09 Jun 2026
- Current version
- Decision reported 9 June 2026 · 09 Jun 2026
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- AI is limited to search, organisation and processing of information.
- Human verification required before any AI output enters an official document.
- Judges may not delegate evidence evaluation, fact interpretation or decisions to AI.
- AI-detector output lacks the reliability needed for judicial findings.
- Referral to the Comision Seccional de Disciplina Judicial de Bogota.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Decision reported 9 June 2026current | 2026-06-09 | Initial decision; reported by Infobae and El Tiempo, official text not obtained. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Council of State, Third Section: parameters for AI use in proceedings and disciplinary referral" (Council of State (Consejo de Estado, Seccion Tercera), Decision reported 9 June 2026, 2026-06-09), safelegalai.com/regulation/other/co-consejo-de-estado-ai-rules-2026 (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in Other
- Letter No. 112/WKMA.Y/HK2.1/IX/2026: draft judgment-writing guidance and templates for the new Criminal Codes · Mahkamah Agung
- AI in the advocate's practice: opportunities, tools and safe use [DI advokato praktikoje: galimybės, įrankiai ir saugus naudojimas] · Lietuvos advokatūra
- Supreme Court of Japan generative-AI demonstration for civil trials (FY2027 budget request) · Supreme Court of Japan
- Recommendation Guide on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers [Avukatlar İçin Yapay Zekâ Kullanımı Tavsiye Rehberi] · Türkiye Barolar Birliği (TBB)
- Decision No. 1671/QD-TTg approving the National Strategy on Artificial Intelligence to 2030, vision to 2045 · Prime Minister of Vietnam
- Guideline on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Indonesian Advocates [Pedoman Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan] · PERADI