Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Proposed amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 (generative AI certification)
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
last revised 2024-06-01last verified 2026-09-031 versioncountry page →
Court ruleWithdrawnCertification
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI output
In late 2023 the Fifth Circuit proposed requiring every filer to certify either that no generative AI was used or that all AI-generated text had been reviewed by a human. After public comment the court announced in June 2024 that it would not adopt the rule, relying on existing Rule 11 and candor obligations. No AI-specific rule applies.
- Applies to
- lawyers, litigants
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Court decision not to adopt · 01 Jun 2024
- Last verified
- 03 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Would have required a certificate in every brief about the use of generative AI.
- Not adopted; the court concluded existing rules already govern accuracy and candor.
- Parties remain bound by Rule 11 and professional conduct rules for any AI-assisted filing.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Court decision not to adoptcurrent | 2024-06-01 | First version recorded. | official |
Read our analysis: US federal court AI standing orders: who requires what →
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Proposed amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 (generative AI certification)" (United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, Court decision not to adopt, 2024-06-01), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-ca5-proposed-rule-32-3-genai-certification (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Proposed Federal Rule of Evidence 707: Machine-Generated Evidence · US Judicial Conference
- Standing Order on Artificial Intelligence (Judge Wendy W. Berger) · M.D. Fla. (Berger)
- Standing Order on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Judge James L. Graham) · S.D. Ohio (Graham)
- Policy Memorandum 25-40: Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in EOIR Proceedings · DOJ EOIR
- Interim guidance on the use of artificial intelligence in the federal judiciary · AO of the US Courts
- ABA Formal Opinion 512: Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools · ABA