Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Standing Order on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Judge James L. Graham)
United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Judge James L. Graham · Ohio
last revised 2025-10-21last verified 2026-10-051 versioncountry page →
Standing orderIn forceDisclosureCertificationVerification duty
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI output
Standing order of 21 October 2025 by Judge James Graham (S.D. Ohio). A filing prepared with generative AI must carry a declaration naming the platform and identifying the AI-assisted content by page, section or paragraph, and certifying that the filer reviewed the sources and verified the submission's accuracy under Rule 11(b).
- Applies to
- lawyers, litigants
- Effective
- 21 Oct 2025
- Current version
- Original · 21 Oct 2025
- Last verified
- 05 Oct 2026
What the document requires
- Any party, including a pro se litigant, who uses generative AI to help generate any portion of a filing must submit a declaration captioned 'Disclosure of the Use of Generative AI'.
- The declaration must identify the AI-assisted content by page, section or paragraph and state the platform used.
- The filer must certify having reviewed the relevant source material and verified that all submissions are accurate and comply with Rule 11(b).
- The signer is responsible for the filing under Rule 11 whether or not AI was used; failure to comply with Rule 11(b) may lead to sanctions under Rule 11(c).
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2025-10-21 | First version recorded. | official |
Read our analysis: US state and federal AI court instruments: what 268 require, September 2026 →
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Standing Order on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Judge James L. Graham)" (United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Judge James L. Graham, Original, 2025-10-21), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-sd-ohio-graham-genai-standing-order (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)