Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Standing Order on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Judge James L. Graham)
United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Judge James L. Graham · Ohio
last revised 2025-10-21last verified 2026-09-031 versioncountry page →
Standing orderIn forceDisclosureCertificationVerification duty
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI output
A standing order issued 21 October 2025 by Judge James Graham of the Southern District of Ohio. Any filing prepared with generative AI must be accompanied by a declaration disclosing that AI was used, identifying the platform, describing which content was AI-generated, and confirming that a human verified every citation and factual assertion before filing.
- Applies to
- lawyers, litigants
- Effective
- 21 Oct 2025
- Current version
- Original · 21 Oct 2025
- Last verified
- 03 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Declaration required with any filing that used generative AI.
- Declaration must name the platform and describe what content was AI-generated.
- Filer must confirm human verification of all citations, quotations and facts.
- Failure to comply may result in the filing being struck and sanctions.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2025-10-21 | First version recorded. | official |
Read our analysis: US federal court AI standing orders: who requires what →
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Standing Order on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Judge James L. Graham)" (United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Judge James L. Graham, Original, 2025-10-21), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-sd-ohio-graham-genai-standing-order (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Proposed Federal Rule of Evidence 707: Machine-Generated Evidence · US Judicial Conference
- Standing Order on Artificial Intelligence (Judge Wendy W. Berger) · M.D. Fla. (Berger)
- Policy Memorandum 25-40: Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in EOIR Proceedings · DOJ EOIR
- Interim guidance on the use of artificial intelligence in the federal judiciary · AO of the US Courts
- ABA Formal Opinion 512: Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools · ABA
- Proposed amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 (generative AI certification) · Fifth Circuit