Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Standing Order on Artificial Intelligence (Judge Wendy W. Berger)
United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Judge Wendy W. Berger · Florida
last revised 2026-04-02last verified 2026-09-031 versioncountry page →
Standing orderIn forceVerification dutyCertification
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI outputSanctions for AI misuse
A standing order issued 2 April 2026 by Judge Wendy Berger of the Middle District of Florida governing AI-assisted filings. Counsel and self-represented parties are responsible for the accuracy of any AI-generated content; misrepresenting its accuracy can lead to sanctions up to dismissal or default judgment and referral to the state bar or the court's grievance committee.
- Applies to
- lawyers, litigants
- Effective
- 02 Apr 2026
- Current version
- Original · 02 Apr 2026
- Last verified
- 03 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Filers remain fully responsible for verifying AI-generated citations, quotations and facts.
- Misrepresentation of the accuracy of AI content may result in dismissal, default or monetary sanctions.
- Attorneys may be referred to the Florida Bar or the court's grievance committee.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2026-04-02 | First version recorded. | official |
Read our analysis: US federal court AI standing orders: who requires what →
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Standing Order on Artificial Intelligence (Judge Wendy W. Berger)" (United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Judge Wendy W. Berger, Original, 2026-04-02), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-md-fla-berger-ai-standing-order (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Proposed Federal Rule of Evidence 707: Machine-Generated Evidence · US Judicial Conference
- Standing Order on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Judge James L. Graham) · S.D. Ohio (Graham)
- Policy Memorandum 25-40: Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in EOIR Proceedings · DOJ EOIR
- Interim guidance on the use of artificial intelligence in the federal judiciary · AO of the US Courts
- ABA Formal Opinion 512: Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools · ABA
- Proposed amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 (generative AI certification) · Fifth Circuit