Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Standing Order on Artificial Intelligence (Judge Wendy W. Berger)
United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Judge Wendy W. Berger · Florida
last revised 2026-04-02last verified 2026-10-051 versioncountry page →
Standing orderIn forceVerification dutyCertification
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI outputSanctions for AI misuse
Standing order of 2 April 2026 by Judge Wendy Berger (M.D. Fla.). Every filer must certify that no generative AI was used, or that a human reviewed any AI-drafted language for accuracy and that all citations are real and accurate. Non-compliant filings may be stricken; repeated failures risk dismissal with prejudice, default or referral.
- Applies to
- lawyers, litigants
- Effective
- 02 Apr 2026
- Current version
- Original · 02 Apr 2026
- Last verified
- 05 Oct 2026
What the document requires
- Every filing must end with a certification that no generative AI was used, or that AI-drafted language (even if later edited) was personally reviewed by the filer or another human for accuracy.
- Where AI was used, the certification must confirm that all legal citations reference actual cases or authority and accurately reflect their contents.
- The AI certification does not count against page limits.
- Non-compliant filings may be stricken without substantive consideration and without leave to amend.
- Numerous failures to certify or to ensure the accuracy of AI-generated content will result in sanctions up to dismissal with prejudice, default and referral to the proper licensing authority; Rule 11 and 28 U.S.C. 1927 still apply.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2026-04-02 | First version recorded. | official · archive |
Read our analysis: US state and federal AI court instruments: what 268 require, September 2026 →
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Standing Order on Artificial Intelligence (Judge Wendy W. Berger)" (United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Judge Wendy W. Berger, Original, 2026-04-02), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-md-fla-berger-ai-standing-order (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)