Bill reforming the Organic Code of the Judicial Function to regulate AI use in judicial proceedings
National Assembly of Ecuador (Asamblea Nacional)
last revised 2026-07-13last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
StatuteProposedVerification duty
map categories:Duty to verify AI outputSanctions for AI misuseAI barred from deciding cases
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Bill amending the Organic Code of the Judicial Function so that judges and judicial officials may not use AI-generated information without first verifying its accuracy, relevance and currency; lawyers may not file AI-generated content without verifying it where it could mislead; and incorporating unverified AI content becomes a serious disciplinary offence for judicial personnel.
- Applies to
- judges, court-staff, lawyers
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Presented by Asambleista Monica Salazar · 13 Jul 2026
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Verification duty for judges before using AI-generated information.
- Verification duty for lawyers filing AI-generated content.
- Serious disciplinary offence for judicial personnel who incorporate unverified AI output.
- Judges remain responsible for signed documents regardless of AI assistance.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Presented by Asambleista Monica Salazarcurrent | 2026-07-13 | Introduced; awaiting Legislative Administration Council review. No official URL located. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Bill reforming the Organic Code of the Judicial Function to regulate AI use in judicial proceedings" (National Assembly of Ecuador (Asamblea Nacional), Presented by Asambleista Monica Salazar, 2026-07-13), safelegalai.com/regulation/other/ec-cofj-reform-bill-ai-2026 (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in Other
- Letter No. 112/WKMA.Y/HK2.1/IX/2026: draft judgment-writing guidance and templates for the new Criminal Codes · Mahkamah Agung
- AI in the advocate's practice: opportunities, tools and safe use [DI advokato praktikoje: galimybės, įrankiai ir saugus naudojimas] · Lietuvos advokatūra
- Supreme Court of Japan generative-AI demonstration for civil trials (FY2027 budget request) · Supreme Court of Japan
- Recommendation Guide on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers [Avukatlar İçin Yapay Zekâ Kullanımı Tavsiye Rehberi] · Türkiye Barolar Birliği (TBB)
- Decision No. 1671/QD-TTg approving the National Strategy on Artificial Intelligence to 2030, vision to 2045 · Prime Minister of Vietnam
- Guideline on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Indonesian Advocates [Pedoman Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan] · PERADI