Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman Requirements
United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois — Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman · Illinois
last revised 2026-09-06last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
Standing orderIn forceCompetence
map categories:Self-represented litigants
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Judge Coleman’s Northern District of Illinois judge-requirements page addresses counsel and unrepresented parties using AI in connection with pleadings, motions, or memoranda. It requires compliance with Rule 11(b) and Rule 26(g) and prohibits AI-generated legal research containing false or inaccurate propositions or non-existent cases.
- Applies to
- lawyers, litigants, parties
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- As posted (undated) · 06 Sept 2026
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Counsel and unrepresented parties using AI with pleadings, motions, or memoranda must comply with Rule 11(b) and Rule 26(g).
- The page prohibits AI-generated legal research containing false or inaccurate propositions.
- The page also prohibits AI-generated legal research citing non-existent cases.
- The AI warning appears in the judge-specific requirements page.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| As posted (undated)current | 2026-09-06 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman Requirements" (United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois — Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman, As posted (undated), 2026-09-06), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-ilnd-coleman-2026-ai-research-warning (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)