Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Policies and Procedures: Requirements for Website References and Artificial Intelligence Use
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania — Judge Mark A. Kearney · Pennsylvania
last revised 2026-02-01last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
Standing orderIn forceVerification duty
map categories:Duty to verify AI output
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Judge Mark A. Kearney’s February 2026 policies and procedures warn parties and counsel that false representations, including artificial-intelligence hallucinations, may lead to sanctions under professional-conduct and civil or criminal procedure rules. The policies put parties and counsel on notice to double-check citations and reliance on AI in filings.
- Applies to
- lawyers, parties
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Original · 01 Feb 2026
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- The policies apply to all matters unless varied by order.
- False representations, including AI hallucinations, may subject parties and counsel to sanctions.
- Parties and counsel are on notice to double-check citations and reliance on AI in filings.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2026-02-01 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Policies and Procedures: Requirements for Website References and Artificial Intelligence Use" (U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania — Judge Mark A. Kearney, Original, 2026-02-01), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-paed-kearney-2026-ai-hallucination-warning (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)