Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Judge Maria Valdez Requirements
United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois — Judge Maria Valdez · Illinois
last revised 2026-09-06last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
Standing orderIn forceCompetence
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filings
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Magistrate Judge Valdez’s Northern District of Illinois judge-requirements page warns all filers that pleadings and other papers must conform with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8, 11, and/or 26(g). It identifies misuse of artificial intelligence as a violation that may result in sanctions.
- Applies to
- all
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- As posted (undated) · 06 Sept 2026
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- All pleadings and other papers filed with the court must conform with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8, 11, and/or 26(g).
- The judge-specific page identifies misuse of artificial intelligence as an example of a violation.
- Violations of those rules, including AI misuse, may result in sanctions.
- The warning is displayed on the official magistrate judge page.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| As posted (undated)current | 2026-09-06 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Judge Maria Valdez Requirements" (United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois — Judge Maria Valdez, As posted (undated), 2026-09-06), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-ilnd-valdez-2026-ai-sanctions-warning (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)