Regulation Tracker / United States (state)
New York City Bar Formal Opinion 2024-5: Generative Artificial Intelligence
New York City Bar Association Committee on Professional Ethics · New York
last revised 2024-08-07last verified 2026-09-031 version
Ethics opinionIn forceVerification dutyConfidentialitySupervisionCompetence
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Formal Opinion 2024-5 from the New York City Bar Association, issued 7 August 2024, applies the New York Rules of Professional Conduct to lawyers' use of generative AI. Lawyers must understand the tools they use, verify all output, protect confidential client information from disclosure to public tools, supervise staff use, and consider whether client disclosure is warranted.
- Applies to
- lawyers, firms
- Effective
- 07 Aug 2024
- Current version
- Original · 07 Aug 2024
- Last verified
- 03 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Competence requires understanding how a generative AI tool works and its limitations.
- Output must be independently verified before it is relied on or filed.
- Confidential information should not be entered into tools that may retain or train on it.
- Supervisory lawyers must set policies for AI use by lawyers and nonlawyer staff.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2024-08-07 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "New York City Bar Formal Opinion 2024-5: Generative Artificial Intelligence" (New York City Bar Association Committee on Professional Ethics, Original, 2024-08-07), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-state/nyc-bar-formal-opinion-2024-5 (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (state)
- Connecticut Judicial Branch, Committee on Artificial Intelligence in the Connecticut Legal System: Final Report · Connecticut Judicial Branch
- Connecticut Practice Book Section 4-9: Generative Artificial Intelligence Compliance · Connecticut Judicial Branch
- In re Amendments to Article V, Rule 1.1 of the Supreme Court Rules (Professional Conduct) and Adoption of Interim Generative AI Guidelines · RI Supreme Court
- Ohio Ethics Guide: Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers and Judicial Officers · Ohio Board of Professional Conduct
- 22 NYCRR Part 161 — Use of Artificial Intelligence Technology · NY Unified Court System
- In re Amendments to Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.515 (generative AI), SC2026-0673 · Florida Supreme Court