Skip to content

Regulation Tracker / United States (state)

Part 2 Rules: Artificial Intelligence Programs

New York Supreme Court, Kings County, Civil Term — Judge Aaron D. Maslow · New York

last revised 2026-01-01last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →

Standing orderIn forceDisclosureCertificationVerification duty

map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI outputSelf-represented litigants

Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.

Justice Aaron D. Maslow’s Kings County Part 2 rules require every motion submission to certify whether generative AI was used in drafting affidavits, affirmations, or memoranda of law. If used, the certification must identify the program, documents, and drafted parts after review of generated text, citations, quotations, and legal analysis.

Applies to
lawyers, litigants
Effective
See version history
Current version
As posted (undated) · 01 Jan 2026
Last verified
06 Sept 2026

What the document requires

  • Every motion submission must include a GenAI-use certification.
  • If GenAI was used, generated text, citations, quotations, and legal analysis must be reviewed for accuracy and approved.
  • The program, documents, and parts drafted by GenAI must be specified.
  • An attorney discovering hallucinations in an opponent’s submission must immediately inform the court.

Version history

VersionDateWhat changedSource
As posted (undated)current2026-01-01First version recorded.official

Sources

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Part 2 Rules: Artificial Intelligence Programs" (New York Supreme Court, Kings County, Civil Term — Judge Aaron D. Maslow, As posted (undated), 2026-01-01), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-state/us-ny-supreme-maslow-2026-genai-motion-certification (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.

More official documents in United States (state)