Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Artificial Intelligence Notice to Attorneys and Self-Represented Parties
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri · Missouri
last revised 2026-09-06last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
GuidanceIn forceCompetence
map categories:Self-represented litigants
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
The Eastern District of Missouri’s Artificial Intelligence attorney page is a concise notice. It does not require disclosure or certification, but it states that attorneys and self-represented parties presenting any pleading, written motion, or paper remain responsible for its contents, including AI-generated portions, under Rule 11(b).
- Applies to
- lawyers, litigants
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- As posted (undated) · 06 Sept 2026
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Court website notice states filers acknowledge responsibility for all filed content.
- The responsibility includes any portion generated with artificial intelligence.
- The notice cites Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(b).
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| As posted (undated)current | 2026-09-06 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Artificial Intelligence Notice to Attorneys and Self-Represented Parties" (U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, As posted (undated), 2026-09-06), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-moed-court-ai-notice-responsibility (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)