Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Initial Order Governing All Further Proceedings: Disclosure of Use of Artificial Intelligence
United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama — Judge Annemarie Carney Axon · Alabama
last revised 2025-05-23last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
Standing orderIn forceDisclosureCertification
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI outputSelf-represented litigants
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Judge Axon of the Northern District of Alabama requires AI disclosure in civil submissions. The May 23, 2025 initial order requires attorneys and pro se parties who use AI to prepare filings to identify the AI tool and certify independent review for accuracy, legitimacy, and good law.
- Applies to
- lawyers, litigants
- Effective
- 23 May 2025
- Current version
- Original · 23 May 2025
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Counsel and pro se parties must disclose AI use in any capacity to prepare documents submitted to the court.
- An attorney or pro se party using AI must sign and file a disclosure of the use of artificial intelligence.
- The disclosure identifies the AI tool and certifies independent review for accuracy, legitimacy, and good law under Rule 11.
- The court does not recognize mistake, lack of technical expertise, or time constraints as good-faith excuses.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2025-05-23 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Initial Order Governing All Further Proceedings: Disclosure of Use of Artificial Intelligence" (United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama — Judge Annemarie Carney Axon, Original, 2025-05-23), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-alnd-axon-2025-ai-disclosure (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)