Judiciary Information and Communication Technology Policy, 2083 (2026)
Supreme Court of Nepal (full bench)
last revised 2026-06-24last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
PolicyIn forceProhibitionPermissiveCompetence
map categories:Judges' use of AIAI barred from deciding casesCourts' own AI deploymentVendor due diligenceMandatory AI training
Nepal's judiciary-wide ICT policy approved by the Supreme Court full bench in mid-2026. Strategy 5.2 adopts AI as an innovation tool: AI-based systems will support drafting, research and case management, but AI shall not be used in a way that directly intrudes on judicial decisions, and third-party AI must be assessed for reliability and bias before use.
- Applies to
- judges, court-staff
- Effective
- 24 Jun 2026
- Current version
- Original · 24 Jun 2026
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- 5.2.1: AI-based systems for drafting and research support; no AI use that directly affects judicial decisions.
- 5.2.2: internal or third-party AI systems assessed for reliability, transparency, non-bias and algorithmic processes.
- 5.2.3: AI-assisted data entry in the case-management system.
- Awareness and training for judges, officials, Bar members and court users.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2026-06-24 | Approved by the Supreme Court full bench; document dated 2083-03-10 BS; adoption reported 3 July 2026. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Judiciary Information and Communication Technology Policy, 2083 (2026)" (Supreme Court of Nepal (full bench), Original, 2026-06-24), safelegalai.com/regulation/other/np-judiciary-ict-policy-2083 (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in Other
- Letter No. 112/WKMA.Y/HK2.1/IX/2026: draft judgment-writing guidance and templates for the new Criminal Codes · Mahkamah Agung
- AI in the advocate's practice: opportunities, tools and safe use [DI advokato praktikoje: galimybės, įrankiai ir saugus naudojimas] · Lietuvos advokatūra
- Supreme Court of Japan generative-AI demonstration for civil trials (FY2027 budget request) · Supreme Court of Japan
- Recommendation Guide on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers [Avukatlar İçin Yapay Zekâ Kullanımı Tavsiye Rehberi] · Türkiye Barolar Birliği (TBB)
- Decision No. 1671/QD-TTg approving the National Strategy on Artificial Intelligence to 2030, vision to 2045 · Prime Minister of Vietnam
- Guideline on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Indonesian Advocates [Pedoman Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan] · PERADI