Regulation Tracker / United States (state)
Administrative Order No. ADM25-001 Adopting the Judiciary of Guam Policy on Artificial Intelligence
Supreme Court of Guam · Guam
last revised 2025-04-30last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
country page →Standing orderIn forceCertificationConfidentiality
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsClient data in AI toolsSelf-represented litigantsCourts' own AI deployment
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
The Supreme Court of Guam’s administrative order adopts a judiciary-wide AI policy effective May 1, 2025. The policy covers attorneys, litigants, judges, and court personnel; says AI use should not be discouraged; does not mandate pleading disclosure; requires thorough review of AI-generated submissions; and protects sensitive information.
- Applies to
- court-staff, judges, lawyers, litigants, parties
- Effective
- 01 May 2025
- Current version
- Original · 30 Apr 2025
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
- Official text
- guamcourts.gov/sites/default/files/AO2025-001.pdf
What the document requires
- The Supreme Court adopts the Judiciary of Guam Policy on Artificial Intelligence effective May 1, 2025.
- The policy applies to judiciary employees, attorneys, judges, court personnel, and litigants.
- Disclosure of AI usage should not be mandated in court pleadings.
- All users must thoroughly review AI-generated content before submission in judicial proceedings.
- AI applications must not compromise confidential communications, personal identifying information, health information, public safety data, or security-related information.
- Judges remain ultimately responsible for their decisions.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2025-04-30 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Administrative Order No. ADM25-001 Adopting the Judiciary of Guam Policy on Artificial Intelligence" (Supreme Court of Guam, Original, 2025-04-30), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-state/us-guam-supreme-court-2025-ai-policy (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (state)
- California SB 574 (Chapter 858, Statutes of 2026): generative AI duties for attorneys and arbitrators · California Legislature
- Standing Order – Jury Trials · Circuit Court of Cook County, Law Division, Trial Section (Judge Cleary)
- Standing Order for Courtroom 2309 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Law Division, Trial Section (Judge Golden)
- Standing Order, General Chancery Calendar 9 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division (Judge Horan)
- Amended and Restated Standing Order, Calendar 60 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, Mortgage Foreclosure/Mechanics Lien Section (Judge Seaton)
- Amended and Restated Standing Order, Calendar 60 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, Mortgage Foreclosure/Mechanics Lien Section (Judge Sullivan)