Policy Regarding Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools in District Judiciary
High Court of Kerala · Kerala
last revised 2025-07-19last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
PolicyIn forceProhibitionVerification dutyConfidentiality
map categories:Judges' use of AIAI barred from deciding casesDuty to verify AI outputClient data in AI toolsCourts' own AI deploymentVendor due diligence
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
A policy issued by the High Court of Kerala on 19 July 2025 for the state's district judiciary, the first by an Indian High Court. Judges and court staff may use AI only for assistance and must not use it to reach findings, orders or judgments; outputs must be verified and confidential case data kept out of public tools.
- Applies to
- judges, court-staff
- Effective
- 19 Jul 2025
- Current version
- Original · 19 Jul 2025
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- AI tools may not be used to arrive at findings, reliefs, orders or judgments.
- Approved AI may assist with administrative and clerical tasks only.
- Any AI output used must be verified by the judicial officer.
- Confidential case information must not be entered into public AI tools.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2025-07-19 | First version recorded. | official · archive |
Related court incidents on the record
Read our analysis: AI guidance beyond the big jurisdictions: India, Brazil, Hong Kong, the Gulf →
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Policy Regarding Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools in District Judiciary" (High Court of Kerala, Original, 2025-07-19), safelegalai.com/regulation/india/kerala-hc-ai-policy-district-judiciary (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in India
- Vijay Ghanshyam Gadiya v Union of India, 2026 INSC 947 · Supreme Court of India
- Bar Council of India circular on digital and social-media conduct and professional responsibility of advocates · BCI
- Pooja Ramesh Singh v Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd, 2026 INSC 668 · Supreme Court of India
- Draft Regulations for Use of Artificial Intelligence in Courts, 2026 · Supreme Court of India
- Directive prohibiting judicial officers from using AI tools for judgments and legal research · Punjab and Haryana High Court
- Policy on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial and Court Administration · Gujarat High Court