Protocol for the use of artificial intelligence in the Judicial Function (Ethics Committee)
Ethics Committee of the Judicial Function (Comite de Etica de la Funcion Judicial)
last revised 2026-06-16last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
PolicyProposedProhibitionVerification dutyDisclosureConfidentiality
map categories:Judges' use of AIAI barred from deciding casesDisclosure of AI use in filingsClient data in AI toolsCourts' own AI deployment
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Twenty-three-principle protocol drafted by the Judiciary Council, National Court, Prosecutor General and Public Defender: no AI may issue, replace or determine judicial decisions; public tools are barred for case data and only institutional tools allowed; independent verification is mandatory; every procedural document must declare when and how AI was used. It awaits formal adoption.
- Applies to
- judges, court-staff
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Approved by the Ethics Committee; formal Judiciary Council resolution pending · 16 Jun 2026
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- No AI may issue, replace or determine judicial decisions; judges may not motivate rulings with algorithms or assess credibility via AI.
- Public AI tools prohibited for case data; institutional tools only.
- Independent verification of AI information before use.
- Declaration of AI use in all procedural documents.
- No AI translation or analysis of Kichwa and Shuar testimony.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Approved by the Ethics Committee; formal Judiciary Council resolution pendingcurrent | 2026-06-16 | Initial protocol; no official URL located, content from El Universo reporting. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Protocol for the use of artificial intelligence in the Judicial Function (Ethics Committee)" (Ethics Committee of the Judicial Function (Comite de Etica de la Funcion Judicial), Approved by the Ethics Committee; formal Judiciary Council resolution pending, 2026-06-16), safelegalai.com/regulation/other/ec-comite-etica-funcion-judicial-protocolo-ia-2026 (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in Other
- Letter No. 112/WKMA.Y/HK2.1/IX/2026: draft judgment-writing guidance and templates for the new Criminal Codes · Mahkamah Agung
- AI in the advocate's practice: opportunities, tools and safe use [DI advokato praktikoje: galimybės, įrankiai ir saugus naudojimas] · Lietuvos advokatūra
- Supreme Court of Japan generative-AI demonstration for civil trials (FY2027 budget request) · Supreme Court of Japan
- Recommendation Guide on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers [Avukatlar İçin Yapay Zekâ Kullanımı Tavsiye Rehberi] · Türkiye Barolar Birliği (TBB)
- Decision No. 1671/QD-TTg approving the National Strategy on Artificial Intelligence to 2030, vision to 2045 · Prime Minister of Vietnam
- Guideline on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Indonesian Advocates [Pedoman Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan] · PERADI