Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Standing Order Re: Artificial Intelligence in Cases Assigned to Judge Scott
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania — Judge Kai N. Scott · Pennsylvania
last revised 2025-03-03last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
country page →Standing orderIn forceDisclosureCertificationVerification duty
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI outputSelf-represented litigants
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Judge Kai N. Scott’s March 3, 2025 standing order requires an attorney or pro se party using generative AI, including ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, or similar machine-learning tools, in a citation of legal authority filed with the court to disclose AI use, disclose the specific program, and certify every citation is accurate.
- Applies to
- lawyers, litigants
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Original · 03 Mar 2025
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Applies to AI use in citations of legal authority filed in cases assigned to Judge Scott.
- The filer must disclose that generative AI assisted with citation of legal authority.
- The filer must disclose the specific generative AI program used.
- The filer must certify every citation of legal authority has been verified as accurate.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2025-03-03 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Standing Order Re: Artificial Intelligence in Cases Assigned to Judge Scott" (U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania — Judge Kai N. Scott, Original, 2025-03-03), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-paed-scott-2025-ai-citation-disclosure-certification (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)