Regulation Tracker / United States (state)
Juvenile Local Rule 1.4, Use of Technology
Williams County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division · Ohio
last revised 2026-09-06last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
country page →Court ruleIn forceDisclosure
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsAI-generated evidence
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Williams County Juvenile Local Rule 1.4, effective December 1, 2023, acknowledges that attorneys and parties may use AI in presenting information, exhibits, and pleadings to the juvenile court. It requires a NOTICE disclosure stating how AI was used and the process used to check the accuracy of the provided information.
- Applies to
- lawyers, parties
- Effective
- 01 Dec 2023
- Current version
- As posted (undated) · 06 Sept 2026
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- The rule defines artificial intelligence as allowing machines to learn from experience, adjust to inputs, and perform human-like tasks.
- The rule states that AI accuracy is difficult to determine because AI programs cannot determine whether analyzed data is accurate.
- The court acknowledges that attorneys and parties may use AI in presenting information, exhibits, and pleadings.
- AI use in exchanged or presented information, exhibits, pleadings, or information provided to parties must include a NOTICE disclosure.
- The NOTICE must state how AI was used and the process used to check the accuracy of the information provided.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| As posted (undated)current | 2026-09-06 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Juvenile Local Rule 1.4, Use of Technology" (Williams County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, As posted (undated), 2026-09-06), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-state/us-oh-williams-juvenile-2023-ai-notice-rule (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (state)
- California SB 574 (Chapter 858, Statutes of 2026): generative AI duties for attorneys and arbitrators · California Legislature
- Standing Order – Jury Trials · Circuit Court of Cook County, Law Division, Trial Section (Judge Cleary)
- Standing Order for Courtroom 2309 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Law Division, Trial Section (Judge Golden)
- Standing Order, General Chancery Calendar 9 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division (Judge Horan)
- Amended and Restated Standing Order, Calendar 60 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, Mortgage Foreclosure/Mechanics Lien Section (Judge Seaton)
- Amended and Restated Standing Order, Calendar 60 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, Mortgage Foreclosure/Mechanics Lien Section (Judge Sullivan)