Regulation Tracker / United States (state)
Notice Regarding Court Imposition of Sanctions for Submission of Fabricated Authority Produced by AI
Oregon Court of Appeals · Oregon
last revised 2026-09-06last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
country page →GuidanceIn forceCertificationVerification duty
map categories:Duty to verify AI output
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
The Oregon Court of Appeals notice warns that fabricated authority produced by generative AI can result in striking, monetary sanctions, attorney fees, or dismissal. Anyone using generative AI to prepare filing content must verify cases, quotations, and paraphrased propositions before filing.
- Applies to
- all
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- As posted (undated) · 06 Sept 2026
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- The notice defines fabricated authority to include fake legal or factual content created by generative AI.
- Filing fabricated authorities is grounds for striking, monetary sanctions, attorney fees, or dismissal of the appeal.
- Anyone using generative AI to prepare court-filing content must verify that cited cases exist.
- Users must verify quotations are in the cited cases.
- Users must verify paraphrased propositions are objectively reasonable in light of the cited case.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| As posted (undated)current | 2026-09-06 | First version recorded. | official |
Related court incidents on the record
- R. M. v. Mohr, 353 Or App 182 (2026), A1880922026-09-23 Fine
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Notice Regarding Court Imposition of Sanctions for Submission of Fabricated Authority Produced by AI" (Oregon Court of Appeals, As posted (undated), 2026-09-06), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-state/us-or-appellate-2026-ai-fabricated-authority (accessed 2026-10-05). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (state)
- California SB 574 (Chapter 858, Statutes of 2026): generative AI duties for attorneys and arbitrators · California Legislature
- Standing Order – Jury Trials · Circuit Court of Cook County, Law Division, Trial Section (Judge Cleary)
- Standing Order for Courtroom 2309 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Law Division, Trial Section (Judge Golden)
- Standing Order, General Chancery Calendar 9 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division (Judge Horan)
- Amended and Restated Standing Order, Calendar 60 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, Mortgage Foreclosure/Mechanics Lien Section (Judge Seaton)
- Amended and Restated Standing Order, Calendar 60 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, Mortgage Foreclosure/Mechanics Lien Section (Judge Sullivan)