TSJ Navarra, Social Chamber (Apr 2026): Art. 247 LEC proceedings archived after apology for AI-invented citations
High Court of Justice of Navarre (Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Navarra) · Navarre
last revised 2026-04-04last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
Judgment (guidance)In forceVerification duty
map categories:Sanctions for AI misuseDuty to verify AI output
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Counsel's October 2025 appeal quoted passages attributed to the Constitutional Court, Supreme Court and two regional high courts that did not match any real ruling. The chamber opened Article 247 LEC bad-faith proceedings in February 2026 but archived them without fine after the lawyer apologised and withdrew the citations, while warning about AI hallucination and the non-delegable verification duty.
- Applies to
- lawyers, parties
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- April 2026 (rapporteur Maria Jose Ramo) · 04 Apr 2026
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Careless use of AI in judicial filings has deontological implications and can amount to procedural bad faith.
- Prompt acknowledgement and withdrawal weighed against sanction.
- Follows TSJ Navarra Auto 2/2024, the first Spanish decision on ChatGPT-generated filings.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| April 2026 (rapporteur Maria Jose Ramo)current | 2026-04-04 | Reported by El Espanol on 4 April 2026; official text not obtained. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "TSJ Navarra, Social Chamber (Apr 2026): Art. 247 LEC proceedings archived after apology for AI-invented citations" (High Court of Justice of Navarre (Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Navarra), April 2026 (rapporteur Maria Jose Ramo), 2026-04-04), safelegalai.com/regulation/other/es-tsj-navarra-2026-citas-inventadas-sin-sancion (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in Other
- Letter No. 112/WKMA.Y/HK2.1/IX/2026: draft judgment-writing guidance and templates for the new Criminal Codes · Mahkamah Agung
- AI in the advocate's practice: opportunities, tools and safe use [DI advokato praktikoje: galimybės, įrankiai ir saugus naudojimas] · Lietuvos advokatūra
- Supreme Court of Japan generative-AI demonstration for civil trials (FY2027 budget request) · Supreme Court of Japan
- Recommendation Guide on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers [Avukatlar İçin Yapay Zekâ Kullanımı Tavsiye Rehberi] · Türkiye Barolar Birliği (TBB)
- Decision No. 1671/QD-TTg approving the National Strategy on Artificial Intelligence to 2030, vision to 2045 · Prime Minister of Vietnam
- Guideline on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Indonesian Advocates [Pedoman Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan] · PERADI