Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Guidance on Use of Artificial Intelligence-Based Tools in Practice Before the United States Patent and Trademark Office
United States Patent and Trademark Office, including PTAB and TTAB — Judge Katherine K. Vidal
last revised 2024-04-11last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
PolicyIn forceCertification
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI outputSelf-represented litigants
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
The USPTO guidance states that AI tools are not prohibited and generally need not be disclosed in USPTO practice, including PTAB and TTAB filings, but signed AI-assisted papers must be human reviewed, supported by reasonable inquiry, checked for factual and legal accuracy, and handled to protect confidentiality and USPTO systems.
- Applies to
- lawyers, litigants, parties
- Effective
- 11 Apr 2024
- Current version
- Original · 11 Apr 2024
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- The guidance applies to practice before the USPTO, including filings submitted to the PTAB and TTAB.
- There is no prohibition against using computer tools, including generative AI, to draft documents for USPTO submission.
- There is not presently a general duty to inform the USPTO that an AI tool was used unless specifically requested.
- Any paper submitted to the USPTO must be reviewed by the party or parties presenting it, who remain responsible for the contents.
- Parties should confirm facts, citations, legal contentions, and confidentiality obligations when AI tools are used.
- AI systems may not obtain USPTO.gov accounts or apply a person’s signature without that person personally entering it.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2024-04-11 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Guidance on Use of Artificial Intelligence-Based Tools in Practice Before the United States Patent and Trademark Office" (United States Patent and Trademark Office, including PTAB and TTAB — Judge Katherine K. Vidal, Original, 2024-04-11), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-uspto-office-2024-ai-tools-guidance (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)