Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Standing Order 26-01 on Use of Artificial Intelligence in Preparing Court Filings
U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas — Judge John W. Broomes · Kansas
last revised 2026-01-28last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
Standing orderIn forceDisclosureVerification duty
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI outputSelf-represented litigants
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Chief Judge Broomes’s District of Kansas standing order cautions all lawyers and parties, including pro se litigants, about AI-created false statements and fabricated authorities. It makes filers responsible for reviewing and verifying AI-drafted or assisted content and reserves discretion to require sworn AI-use disclosures.
- Applies to
- lawyers, litigants, parties
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Original · 28 Jan 2026
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Filers must review and verify AI-drafted or AI-assisted content.
- The order expressly includes citations, quotations, legal analysis, and factual background.
- The court may require a sworn AI-use statement in any case.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2026-01-28 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Standing Order 26-01 on Use of Artificial Intelligence in Preparing Court Filings" (U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas — Judge John W. Broomes, Original, 2026-01-28), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-ksd-court-2026-standing-order-ai-filings (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)