Skip to content

Regulation Tracker / United States (state)

90th Judicial District Standing Order Regarding Use of Artificial Intelligence

90th Judicial District Court of Texas — Judge Phillip Gregory · Texas

last revised 2026-02-10last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →

Standing orderIn forceDisclosureCertificationVerification dutyProhibition

map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI outputSelf-represented litigantsAI-generated evidence

Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.

The 90th Judicial District standing order applies to all pending and future cases in Young and Stephens Counties. It requires a certificate in each pleading generated with AI, certifying traditional-source verification of AI-created content, and separately prohibits AI recording, listening, or transcription in courtrooms and court offices.

Applies to
all, lawyers, litigants
Effective
10 Feb 2026
Current version
Original · 10 Feb 2026
Last verified
06 Sept 2026

What the document requires

  • Attorneys and self-represented litigants using AI for legal research or drafting must include a certificate in each AI-generated pleading.
  • The certificate requires traditional-source accuracy verification of AI-created language, citations, arguments, and legal analysis.
  • AI recording, listening, or transcription in courtrooms and court offices is prohibited.

Version history

VersionDateWhat changedSource
Originalcurrent2026-02-10First version recorded.official

Sources

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "90th Judicial District Standing Order Regarding Use of Artificial Intelligence" (90th Judicial District Court of Texas — Judge Phillip Gregory, Original, 2026-02-10), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-state/us-tx-90th-district-2026-artificial-intelligence-standing-order (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.

More official documents in United States (state)