Regulation Tracker / United States (state)
Interim Policy on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence by Judicial Officers and Court Personnel
Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania · Pennsylvania
last revised 2025-09-09last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
country page →PolicyIn forceCertification
map categories:Courts' own AI deployment
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court approved an interim GenAI policy on September 9, 2025, effective December 8, 2025, for judicial officers and Unified Judicial System personnel. Personnel may use approved GenAI for listed work purposes, must understand tool limits, remain responsible for accuracy, and may not share non-public information with non-secured AI systems.
- Applies to
- court-staff, judges
- Effective
- 08 Dec 2025
- Current version
- Original · 09 Sept 2025
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Personnel may only use or install GenAI tools approved by leadership.
- Permitted uses include summaries, preliminary legal research, initial drafts, editing public documents, and public chatbots.
- Personnel must understand technical capabilities and limitations and remain responsible for accuracy.
- Personnel shall not share non-public information with non-secured AI systems.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2025-09-09 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Interim Policy on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence by Judicial Officers and Court Personnel" (Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania, Original, 2025-09-09), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-state/us-pa-ujs-2025-genai-personnel-policy (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (state)
- California SB 574 (Chapter 858, Statutes of 2026): generative AI duties for attorneys and arbitrators · California Legislature
- Standing Order – Jury Trials · Circuit Court of Cook County, Law Division, Trial Section (Judge Cleary)
- Standing Order for Courtroom 2309 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Law Division, Trial Section (Judge Golden)
- Standing Order, General Chancery Calendar 9 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division (Judge Horan)
- Amended and Restated Standing Order, Calendar 60 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, Mortgage Foreclosure/Mechanics Lien Section (Judge Seaton)
- Amended and Restated Standing Order, Calendar 60 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, Mortgage Foreclosure/Mechanics Lien Section (Judge Sullivan)