Regulation Tracker / United States (state)
Part 3 Rules: Artificial Intelligence
New York State Supreme Court, Niagara County — Judge Michael J. Norris · New York
last revised 2026-06-05last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
country page →Standing orderIn forceCertificationVerification dutyProhibition
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI outputAI-generated evidence
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Justice Michael J. Norris’s Part 3 rules, as of June 5, 2026, use the Part 161 model-rule language requiring attorney or party users of AI tools in court papers to carefully review and independently ensure no fabricated or fictitious content. The rules also bar recording or transcribing phone or Teams proceedings using AI software or tools.
- Applies to
- lawyers, parties
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- As posted (undated) · 05 Jun 2026
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Attorneys and parties using AI to prepare papers must understand tool capabilities and limitations.
- They must carefully review papers and independently ensure no fabricated or fictitious cases, statutes, or other material.
- By signing, the attorney or party certifies that review and absence of fictitious content.
- Recording or transcribing phone or Teams proceedings by AI software or tools is not permitted.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| As posted (undated)current | 2026-06-05 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Part 3 Rules: Artificial Intelligence" (New York State Supreme Court, Niagara County — Judge Michael J. Norris, As posted (undated), 2026-06-05), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-state/us-ny-supreme-norris-2026-part161-ai-review-recording (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (state)
- California SB 574 (Chapter 858, Statutes of 2026): generative AI duties for attorneys and arbitrators · California Legislature
- Standing Order – Jury Trials · Circuit Court of Cook County, Law Division, Trial Section (Judge Cleary)
- Standing Order for Courtroom 2309 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Law Division, Trial Section (Judge Golden)
- Standing Order, General Chancery Calendar 9 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division (Judge Horan)
- Amended and Restated Standing Order, Calendar 60 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, Mortgage Foreclosure/Mechanics Lien Section (Judge Seaton)
- Amended and Restated Standing Order, Calendar 60 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, Mortgage Foreclosure/Mechanics Lien Section (Judge Sullivan)