Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Order on Artificial Intelligence
United States Court of International Trade — Judge Stephen Alexander Vaden
last revised 2023-06-08last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
Standing orderIn forceDisclosureConfidentiality
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsClient data in AI tools
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Judge Stephen Alexander Vaden of the Court of International Trade requires any party filing AI-drafted text in his cases to provide a notice identifying the generative AI program and the specific drafted portions, and to certify that no confidential or business proprietary information was disclosed to an unauthorized party.
- Applies to
- lawyers, parties
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Original · 08 Jun 2023
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Applies to submissions in cases assigned to Judge Vaden containing text drafted with generative AI based on natural language prompts.
- Names ChatGPT and Google Bard as examples of covered generative AI programs.
- Requires a disclosure notice identifying the program used and the specific portions of text drafted with it.
- Requires certification that use of the program did not disclose confidential or business proprietary information to unauthorized parties.
- Allows any party to seek relief under statute or USCIT rules after the notice is filed.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2023-06-08 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Order on Artificial Intelligence" (United States Court of International Trade — Judge Stephen Alexander Vaden, Original, 2023-06-08), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-cit-vaden-2023-artificial-intelligence (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)