Skip to content

Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)

Individual Practices in Civil Cases: Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York — Judge Analisa Torres · New York

last revised 2025-11-05last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →

Standing orderIn forceCertificationVerification duty

map categories:Duty to verify AI output

Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.

Judge Analisa Torres’s revised November 5, 2025 civil individual practices remind parties and counsel of Rule 11 duties and require a submitting party and counsel to confirm for themselves that any submission prepared with generative AI, and all source material within it, is accurate and Rule 11 compliant.

Applies to
lawyers, parties
Effective
See version history
Current version
As posted (undated) · 05 Nov 2025
Last verified
06 Sept 2026
Official text
www.nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/practice_documents/AT%20Torr…

What the document requires

  • Applies to submissions prepared using generative AI such as ChatGPT, Harvey, CoCounsel, or Google Bard.
  • The submitting party and counsel must confirm accuracy and Rule 11 compliance.
  • Parties and counsel remain responsible for the accuracy of submissions.

Version history

VersionDateWhat changedSource
As posted (undated)current2025-11-05First version recorded.official

Sources

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Individual Practices in Civil Cases: Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence" (U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York — Judge Analisa Torres, As posted (undated), 2025-11-05), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-nysd-torres-2025-genai-rule11-confirmation (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.

More official documents in United States (federal)