Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Initial Standing Order
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California — Judge Fernando M. Olguin · California
last revised 2025-07-01last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
country page →Standing orderIn forceCertification
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI outputSelf-represented litigants
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Judge Fernando M. Olguin’s Central District of California initial standing order treats submission of a filing prepared with an AI tool as a certification by the responsible person. The certification covers review of all source material and verification of the accuracy of AI content under Rule 11.
- Applies to
- lawyers, litigants, parties
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Original · 01 Jul 2025
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- If a party or attorney uses an AI tool in preparing a filing, submitting the filing signifies certification.
- The responsible individual certifies that they reviewed all source material.
- The responsible individual certifies that they verified the accuracy of AI content.
- The provision cites Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2025-07-01 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Initial Standing Order" (U.S. District Court for the Central District of California — Judge Fernando M. Olguin, Original, 2025-07-01), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-cacd-olguin-2025-ai-certification (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)