Regulation Tracker / United States (state)
Judicial Council of Georgia Ad Hoc Committee on Artificial Intelligence and the Courts: Report
Judicial Council of Georgia, Ad Hoc Committee on Artificial Intelligence and the Courts · Georgia
last revised 2025-07-03last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
country page →ReportIn forceRisk classificationVerification duty
map categories:Judges' use of AIDisclosure of AI use in filingsCourts' own AI deployment
Georgia's judicial branch response to generative AI. The Ad Hoc Committee on AI and the Courts, established August 2024 under Justice Andrew Pinson, submitted its report on 3 July 2025 focused on court rules and procedures; no implementing Supreme Court order has been verified as of September 2026.
- Applies to
- judges, court-staff, lawyers
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Committee report · 03 Jul 2025
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Committee established August 2024, chaired by Justice Andrew A. Pinson, with membership from state court classes and judicial partner agencies
- Charge: assess risks and benefits of generative AI in the courts and recommend measures to maintain public trust and confidence
- Principal focus on court rules and procedures
- A parallel State Bar of Georgia committee reviews the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct
- Report submitted 3 July 2025; implementing order not verified
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Committee reportcurrent | 2025-07-03 | Report submitted to the Judicial Council | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Judicial Council of Georgia Ad Hoc Committee on Artificial Intelligence and the Courts: Report" (Judicial Council of Georgia, Ad Hoc Committee on Artificial Intelligence and the Courts, Committee report, 2025-07-03), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-state/us-ga-judicial-council-ai-committee-report (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (state)
- California SB 574 (Chapter 858, Statutes of 2026): generative AI duties for attorneys and arbitrators · California Legislature
- Standing Order – Jury Trials · Circuit Court of Cook County, Law Division, Trial Section (Judge Cleary)
- Standing Order for Courtroom 2309 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Law Division, Trial Section (Judge Golden)
- Standing Order, General Chancery Calendar 9 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division (Judge Horan)
- Amended and Restated Standing Order, Calendar 60 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, Mortgage Foreclosure/Mechanics Lien Section (Judge Seaton)
- Amended and Restated Standing Order, Calendar 60 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, Mortgage Foreclosure/Mechanics Lien Section (Judge Sullivan)