Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Standing Order for Civil Cases Before Judge Eumi K. Lee
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California — Judge Eumi K. Lee · California
last revised 2026-08-31last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
Standing orderIn forceCertificationVerification dutyRecord-keeping
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI output
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Judge Eumi K. Lee’s updated civil standing order in the Northern District of California permits generative AI tools with conditions. Counsel must verify AI-assisted research, include a lead-trial-counsel certification for AI-generated submissions, and preserve prompt records if those records become relevant.
- Applies to
- lawyers
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Amended · 31 Aug 2026
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Use of generative AI tools is not prohibited.
- Counsel must personally confirm the accuracy of AI-assisted research.
- Submissions containing AI-generated content must include a certification by lead trial counsel.
- Failure to certify or verify AI-generated content is sanctionable.
- Counsel must maintain prompt and inquiry records if those records become relevant.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amendedcurrent | 2026-08-31 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Standing Order for Civil Cases Before Judge Eumi K. Lee" (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California — Judge Eumi K. Lee, Amended, 2026-08-31), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-cand-lee-2026-ai-certification (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)