National Guidelines for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Institutions
National Judicial (Policy Making) Committee, drafted by the National Judicial Automation Committee
last revised 2026-04-29last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
GuidanceIn forceProhibitionConfidentialityCompetence
map categories:Judges' use of AIAI barred from deciding casesCourts' own AI deploymentMandatory AI trainingData protection and legal AI
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
National guidelines approved by the NJPMC at its 57th meeting on 29 April 2026, developed by the National Judicial Automation Committee after consultation with all High Courts. AI is to assist, not replace, judicial decision-making; permitted uses are case management, legal research, predictive analytics and document processing, with bias, privacy and training safeguards.
- Applies to
- judges, court-staff
- Effective
- 29 Apr 2026
- Current version
- Original · 29 Apr 2026
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Human-centric: judges remain the ultimate arbiters and AI assists only.
- Permitted: case management, legal research, predictive analytics and document processing.
- Ethical and transparent use with safeguards against bias, plus explainability and accountability.
- Strict privacy and data-security standards.
- Structured training programmes for judges and court staff; High Courts retain implementation autonomy.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2026-04-29 | Approved at the 57th NJPMC meeting; official text not located online. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "National Guidelines for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Institutions" (National Judicial (Policy Making) Committee, drafted by the National Judicial Automation Committee, Original, 2026-04-29), safelegalai.com/regulation/other/pk-njpmc-national-ai-guidelines-judicial-institutions-2026 (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in Other
- Letter No. 112/WKMA.Y/HK2.1/IX/2026: draft judgment-writing guidance and templates for the new Criminal Codes · Mahkamah Agung
- AI in the advocate's practice: opportunities, tools and safe use [DI advokato praktikoje: galimybės, įrankiai ir saugus naudojimas] · Lietuvos advokatūra
- Supreme Court of Japan generative-AI demonstration for civil trials (FY2027 budget request) · Supreme Court of Japan
- Recommendation Guide on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers [Avukatlar İçin Yapay Zekâ Kullanımı Tavsiye Rehberi] · Türkiye Barolar Birliği (TBB)
- Decision No. 1671/QD-TTg approving the National Strategy on Artificial Intelligence to 2030, vision to 2045 · Prime Minister of Vietnam
- Guideline on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Indonesian Advocates [Pedoman Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan] · PERADI