Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Standing Order for Civil Cases Before Magistrate Judge Peter H. Kang
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California — Judge Peter H. Kang · California
last revised 2025-07-16last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
country page →Standing orderIn forceDisclosureVerification dutyRecord-keeping
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI outputSelf-represented litigantsAI-generated evidence
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Magistrate Judge Peter H. Kang’s civil standing order gives detailed conditions for AI use in filings, evidence, and confidentiality. It requires identification of AI-drafted text, prompt or portion records on request, discovery disclosure for AI-generated evidence, and verification against hallucinated citations or facts.
- Applies to
- lawyers, litigants, parties
- Effective
- 16 Jul 2025
- Current version
- Amended · 16 Jul 2025
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- AI-created or AI-drafted text in briefs, pleadings, or other documents must be identified in a caption, table, or notice.
- Counsel must maintain records sufficient to identify AI-created portions if requested by the court.
- Parties may not file hallucinated citations or uncorroborated assertions of law or fact.
- AI-generated evidentiary material must be disclosed or produced in discovery and identified by notice.
- Counsel and parties must keep records sufficient to corroborate compliance with confidentiality obligations.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amendedcurrent | 2025-07-16 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Standing Order for Civil Cases Before Magistrate Judge Peter H. Kang" (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California — Judge Peter H. Kang, Amended, 2025-07-16), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-cand-kang-2025-ai-filings-evidence (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)