Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Standing Order Requiring Certification Re: Use of Artificial Intelligence in Filings
U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado — Judge Susan Prose · Colorado
last revised 2024-10-21last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
Standing orderIn forceDisclosureCertificationVerification duty
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI output
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Magistrate Judge Susan Prose’s District of Colorado standing order requires AI-use or non-use certifications for specified filings in consent cases and referred nondispositive opposed motions. The preparer must certify human review of AI-drafted language and that legal citations are actual authority, or the filing will be stricken.
- Applies to
- all
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Original · 21 Oct 2024
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- In consent cases, specified motions and opposed motions must contain a certification about use or non-use of generative AI.
- In referral cases, the order applies to nondispositive opposed motions referred to the magistrate judge.
- The preparer must certify no AI drafting or that AI-drafted language was personally reviewed by a human.
- The certification must attest that legal citations are to actual cases or cited authority.
- The court will strike filings that omit the certification.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2024-10-21 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Standing Order Requiring Certification Re: Use of Artificial Intelligence in Filings" (U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado — Judge Susan Prose, Original, 2024-10-21), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-cod-prose-2024-ai-certification (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)