Regulation Tracker / Australia
Practice Direction Number 5 of 2025: Accuracy of References in Submissions
Supreme Court of Queensland · Queensland
last revised 2025-09-24last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
Practice direction / noteIn forceCertificationVerification dutyRecord-keeping
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI outputSanctions for AI misuseSelf-represented litigantsTechnological competence
Issued by Chief Justice Bowskill on 24 September 2025, this practice direction responds to generative AI by requiring every written submission to name the individual person responsible for its contents. Naming oneself certifies that all references have been verified and that the document reflects the practitioner's own professional judgment.
- Applies to
- lawyers, barristers, litigants, parties
- Effective
- 24 Sept 2025
- Current version
- Original · 24 Sept 2025
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Written submissions must name the responsible person or persons at the end of the document; naming a firm is not sufficient.
- The person making oral submissions is the responsible person for those submissions and also for the written submissions.
- The responsible person must verify the accuracy and relevance of all references to legislation, authorities and other sources.
- Practitioners responsible for submissions containing non-existent material may be referred to the Legal Services Commissioner or required to show cause against a personal costs order.
- Self-represented litigants must check references against AustLII, Queensland Judgments and the official legislation sites; reliance on fake material may cause an adjournment and adverse costs.
- Expressly cites Ayinde v Haringey [2025] EWHC 1383 at [5] and the Queensland Law Society's AI guidance statement.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2025-09-24 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Practice Direction Number 5 of 2025: Accuracy of References in Submissions" (Supreme Court of Queensland, Original, 2025-09-24), safelegalai.com/regulation/australia/au-qld-sc-pd-5-2025-accuracy-of-references (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in Australia
- Practice Note SC GEN 25: The Use of Artificial Intelligence by Court Users · Supreme Court of Victoria
- Judicial Guidelines on the Use of Artificial Intelligence · Supreme Court of Victoria
- Practice Direction: Use of Artificial Intelligence (PD-AI) · FCFCOA
- Generative Artificial Intelligence Practice Note (GPN-AI) · Federal Court of Australia
- Practice Note: Generative Artificial Intelligence · NSW Local Court
- A Solicitor's Guide to Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence · Law Society of NSW