Regulation Tracker / United States (state)
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court: Interim Guidelines for Use of Generative AI
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Massachusetts
last revised 2025-12-01last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
GuidanceIn forceProhibitionConfidentiality
map categories:Judges' use of AICourts' own AI deploymentClient data in AI tools
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Massachusetts' first judicial AI instrument. The SJC's interim guidelines let court personnel use generative AI for administrative work using only public information, bar tools that retain or train on entered information, and deliberately leave attorney conduct untouched pending possible later rules.
- Applies to
- judges, court-staff
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Interim · 01 Dec 2025
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Apply to court personnel only: judges, clerks, registers, recorders, employees, law clerks, interns and contractors
- Permit generative AI for administrative tasks using only public information
- Prohibit tools that retain or train on entered information
- Do not govern attorney conduct and do not require attorney AI disclosure in filings
- Described by Chief Justice Budd as a modest first step; subject to revision
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interimcurrent | 2025-12-01 | Announced in the December 2025 State of the Judiciary address; the source gives a month only (announced December 2025), so the day is recorded as the 1st | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court: Interim Guidelines for Use of Generative AI" (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, Interim, 2025-12-01), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-state/us-ma-sjc-interim-genai-guidelines (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (state)
- California SB 574 (Chapter 858, Statutes of 2026): generative AI duties for attorneys and arbitrators · California Legislature
- Standing Order – Jury Trials · Circuit Court of Cook County, Law Division, Trial Section (Judge Cleary)
- Standing Order for Courtroom 2309 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Law Division, Trial Section (Judge Golden)
- Standing Order, General Chancery Calendar 9 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division (Judge Horan)
- Amended and Restated Standing Order, Calendar 60 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, Mortgage Foreclosure/Mechanics Lien Section (Judge Seaton)
- Amended and Restated Standing Order, Calendar 60 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, Mortgage Foreclosure/Mechanics Lien Section (Judge Sullivan)