Regulation Tracker / United States (state)
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court: Interim Guidelines for Use of Generative AI
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Massachusetts
last revised 2025-12-01last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
GuidanceIn forceProhibitionConfidentiality
map categories:Judges' use of AICourts' own AI deploymentClient data in AI tools
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Massachusetts' first judicial AI instrument. The SJC's interim guidelines let court personnel use generative AI for administrative work using only public information, bar tools that retain or train on entered information, and deliberately leave attorney conduct untouched pending possible later rules.
- Applies to
- judges, court-staff
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Interim · 01 Dec 2025
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Apply to court personnel only: judges, clerks, registers, recorders, employees, law clerks, interns and contractors
- Permit generative AI for administrative tasks using only public information
- Prohibit tools that retain or train on entered information
- Do not govern attorney conduct and do not require attorney AI disclosure in filings
- Described by Chief Justice Budd as a modest first step; subject to revision
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interimcurrent | 2025-12-01 | Announced in the December 2025 State of the Judiciary address; the source gives a month only (announced December 2025), so the day is recorded as the 1st | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court: Interim Guidelines for Use of Generative AI" (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, Interim, 2025-12-01), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-state/us-ma-sjc-interim-genai-guidelines (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (state)
- Connecticut Judicial Branch, Committee on Artificial Intelligence in the Connecticut Legal System: Final Report · Connecticut Judicial Branch
- Connecticut Practice Book Section 4-9: Generative Artificial Intelligence Compliance · Connecticut Judicial Branch
- In re Amendments to Article V, Rule 1.1 of the Supreme Court Rules (Professional Conduct) and Adoption of Interim Generative AI Guidelines · RI Supreme Court
- Ohio Ethics Guide: Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers and Judicial Officers · Ohio Board of Professional Conduct
- 22 NYCRR Part 161 — Use of Artificial Intelligence Technology · NY Unified Court System
- In re Amendments to Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.515 (generative AI), SC2026-0673 · Florida Supreme Court