Skip to content

Regulation Tracker / Other

Reference Guidelines for the Use of Artificial Intelligence Systems by the Judicial Yuan and Subordinate Agencies

Judicial Yuan

last revised 2026-04-22last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →

GuidanceIn forceVerification dutyConfidentialityProhibition

map categories:Judges' use of AIDuty to verify AI outputCourts' own AI deploymentVendor due diligence

Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.

Judicial Yuan guidelines issued by order of 22 April 2026 for courts and judicial agencies using AI systems. Chapter 2 governs user conduct: users must understand that generative AI may hallucinate and must cross-check outputs against official documents, case files and legal databases before use; AI may only assist adjudication and deployments must incorporate risk management.

Applies to
judges, court-staff
Effective
22 Apr 2026
Current version
Original · 22 Apr 2026
Last verified
04 Sept 2026
Official text
lawplayer.com/article/6a08db0a3521bb47cdb12c8f

What the document requires

  • Art. 8: verify AI-generated data, factual summaries and legal citations against reliable sources before use.
  • AI assists adjudication only; users retain decision autonomy.
  • Risk management required for system deployment.

Version history

VersionDateWhat changedSource
Originalcurrent2026-04-22Issued by order of 22 April 2026; the official page on judicial.gov.tw was not located, so a mirror of the national law database is cited.official

Sources

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Reference Guidelines for the Use of Artificial Intelligence Systems by the Judicial Yuan and Subordinate Agencies" (Judicial Yuan, Original, 2026-04-22), safelegalai.com/regulation/other/tw-judicial-yuan-ai-system-reference-guidelines-2026 (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.

More official documents in Other