Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Standing Order for Civil Cases
U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado — Judge S. Kato Crews · Colorado
last revised 2026-01-01last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
Standing orderIn forceDisclosureCertificationVerification duty
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI output
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Judge S. Kato Crews’s revised District of Colorado civil standing order requires AI certifications for substantive motions and related briefing. Filers must disclose use or non-use of generative AI, certify human accuracy review when AI drafted language, and confirm citations are real or the filing may be stricken.
- Applies to
- lawyers, parties
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- As posted (undated) · 01 Jan 2026
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Substantive motions, including Rules 12, 56, and 65 motions, responses, and replies, must contain an AI certification.
- The certification must state use or non-use of generative AI.
- If AI drafted language, a filer or another human must personally review it for accuracy.
- The certification must state that all legal citations are actual non-fictitious cases or cited authority.
- The court will strike filings that omit the certification.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| As posted (undated)current | 2026-01-01 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Standing Order for Civil Cases" (U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado — Judge S. Kato Crews, As posted (undated), 2026-01-01), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-cod-crews-2026-ai-certification (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)