Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases: Artificial Intelligence
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York — Judge Jessica G. L. Clarke · New York
last revised 2026-01-01last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
Standing orderIn forceCompetence
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filings
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Judge Jessica G. L. Clarke’s January 2026 civil individual practices state that any attorney using generative artificial intelligence in connection with a court filing or with discovery requests, responses, or objections must comply with Rules 11(b), 26(g), other relevant rules, and applicable ethical rules.
- Applies to
- lawyers
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Original · 01 Jan 2026
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Applies to attorneys using GAI in filings before Judge Clarke.
- Also applies to serving or delivering discovery requests, responses, or objections.
- The rule points attorneys to Rules 11(b), 26(g), other relevant rules, and ethical rules.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2026-01-01 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases: Artificial Intelligence" (U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York — Judge Jessica G. L. Clarke, Original, 2026-01-01), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-nysd-clarke-2026-gai-rule11-26g (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)