Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Standing Order Establishing Disclosure and Certification Requirements for Generative AI
U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico — Judge Margaret I. Strickland · New Mexico
last revised 2026-09-06last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
Standing orderIn forceDisclosureCertificationVerification duty
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI outputSelf-represented litigants
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Judge Strickland’s standing order applies to all cases assigned to her. Parties using generative AI in preparing documents for filing must disclose AI use and the specific tool in the document and certify that AI-drafted portions, including citations and legal authority, were checked for accuracy.
- Applies to
- lawyers, litigants, parties
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- As posted (undated) · 06 Sept 2026
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Any party using GenAI in document preparation must disclose AI use in the document.
- The party must identify the specific AI tool used.
- The filer must certify accuracy of AI-drafted portions, including citations and legal authority.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| As posted (undated)current | 2026-09-06 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Standing Order Establishing Disclosure and Certification Requirements for Generative AI" (U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico — Judge Margaret I. Strickland, As posted (undated), 2026-09-06), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-nmd-strickland-generative-ai-disclosure-certification (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)