Regulation Tracker / United States (state)
Notice to the Bar: Preliminary Guidelines on the Use of Artificial Intelligence by New Jersey Lawyers
Supreme Court of New Jersey — Judge Stuart Rabner · New Jersey
last revised 2024-01-24last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
country page →GuidanceIn forceVerification duty
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI output
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
The New Jersey Supreme Court’s January 24, 2024 Notice to the Bar provides preliminary AI guidelines for New Jersey lawyers. It states lawyers have an ethical duty to check and verify AI-generated information, remain responsible for pleadings, arguments, and evidence, and that the RPCs do not require court disclosure of AI use.
- Applies to
- lawyers
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Original · 24 Jan 2024
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Lawyers must check and verify all AI-generated information to ensure accuracy.
- The RPCs do not require lawyers to disclose AI use to the court.
- Lawyers remain responsible for pleadings, arguments, evidence, and client communications using AI.
- Lawyers must ensure AI system security before entering non-public client information.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2024-01-24 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Notice to the Bar: Preliminary Guidelines on the Use of Artificial Intelligence by New Jersey Lawyers" (Supreme Court of New Jersey — Judge Stuart Rabner, Original, 2024-01-24), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-state/us-nj-supreme-court-2024-ai-lawyer-guidelines (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (state)
- California SB 574 (Chapter 858, Statutes of 2026): generative AI duties for attorneys and arbitrators · California Legislature
- Standing Order – Jury Trials · Circuit Court of Cook County, Law Division, Trial Section (Judge Cleary)
- Standing Order for Courtroom 2309 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Law Division, Trial Section (Judge Golden)
- Standing Order, General Chancery Calendar 9 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division (Judge Horan)
- Amended and Restated Standing Order, Calendar 60 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, Mortgage Foreclosure/Mechanics Lien Section (Judge Seaton)
- Amended and Restated Standing Order, Calendar 60 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, Mortgage Foreclosure/Mechanics Lien Section (Judge Sullivan)