Skip to content

Regulation Tracker / Other

Guidelines on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Judiciary (Judicial AI Research Group)

Judicial AI Research Group, a judges' study society

last revised 2025-02-01last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →

ReportIn forceDisclosureVerification duty

map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsAI-generated evidenceJudges' use of AI

Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.

Non-binding guidelines finalised in February 2025 by the Judicial AI Research Group, a study society of judges founded in October 2023. They propose that courts may require parties to disclose AI use in submitted documents, including the tool, prompts and verification steps; warn about deepfake evidence; and state that existing procedural law governs admissibility.

Applies to
judges, parties
Effective
01 Feb 2025
Current version
Original · 01 Feb 2025
Last verified
04 Sept 2026
Official text
www.legaltimes.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=85019

What the document requires

  • Courts may ask parties whether AI was used to prepare documents, images, audio or video and request tool, prompt and verification details.
  • Existing civil and criminal procedure rules govern admissibility of AI-generated evidence.
  • LLM outputs may contain fabricated citations and must be checked.

Version history

VersionDateWhat changedSource
Originalcurrent2025-02-01Finalised February 2025; a non-binding recommendation of a judges' research group, not court policy.official

Sources

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Guidelines on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Judiciary (Judicial AI Research Group)" (Judicial AI Research Group, a judges' study society, Original, 2025-02-01), safelegalai.com/regulation/other/kr-judicial-ai-research-group-guidelines-2025 (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.

More official documents in Other