Regulation Tracker / United States (state)
Connecticut Judicial Branch, Committee on Artificial Intelligence in the Connecticut Legal System: Final Report
Connecticut Judicial Branch, Committee on Artificial Intelligence in the Connecticut Legal System · Connecticut
last revised 2026-08-10last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
ReportIn forceVerification dutyConfidentialityCompetence
map categories:Judges' use of AICourts' own AI deploymentAI-generated evidenceDisclosure of AI use in filings
The committee established by the Connecticut Judicial Branch to examine AI in the legal system closed with a final report on 10 August 2026. It records that Practice Book section 4-9 and related amendments discharged the rules charge, sets eight guiding principles for judicial AI use, and describes the Branch's permanent AI governance structure.
- Applies to
- judges, court-staff, lawyers
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Final Report · 10 Aug 2026
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- The committee concluded no further court rule or evidence code recommendations were needed after adoption of Practice Book section 4-9, amendments to section 4-2 and corresponding appellate rules amendments
- Guiding principles for Branch AI use: judicial independence, fairness and impartiality, transparency, accountability, protection of confidential information, cybersecurity, human oversight of AI-generated work product, responsible innovation
- The Judicial Branch established an Internal Artificial Intelligence Committee and a standing AI Review Subcommittee to review proposed AI software and hardware before implementation
- The Connecticut Code of Evidence Oversight Committee, chaired by Judge Hope C. Seeley, is reviewing whether the evidence rules need amendment for generative AI
- AI should augment, not replace, human judgment, and AI-derived information should be verified by traditional methods
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Final Reportcurrent | 2026-08-10 | Final report of the committee | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Connecticut Judicial Branch, Committee on Artificial Intelligence in the Connecticut Legal System: Final Report" (Connecticut Judicial Branch, Committee on Artificial Intelligence in the Connecticut Legal System, Final Report, 2026-08-10), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-state/us-ct-ai-legal-system-committee-final-report (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (state)
- California SB 574 (Chapter 858, Statutes of 2026): generative AI duties for attorneys and arbitrators · California Legislature
- Standing Order – Jury Trials · Circuit Court of Cook County, Law Division, Trial Section (Judge Cleary)
- Standing Order for Courtroom 2309 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Law Division, Trial Section (Judge Golden)
- Standing Order, General Chancery Calendar 9 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division (Judge Horan)
- Amended and Restated Standing Order, Calendar 60 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, Mortgage Foreclosure/Mechanics Lien Section (Judge Seaton)
- Amended and Restated Standing Order, Calendar 60 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, Mortgage Foreclosure/Mechanics Lien Section (Judge Sullivan)