Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Proposed Rule 707: Evidence Produced by Artificial Intelligence and Presented at Trial Without an Expert
Federal Rules of Evidence / Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules
last revised 2026-05-17last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
Court ruleProposedDisclosure
map categories:AI-generated evidence
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
The Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules reported a revised proposed Rule 707 that would regulate AI-produced evidence offered at trial without an expert witness, require the proponent to establish Rule 702-style reliability, ordinarily require expert explanation, and require reasonable notice to adverse parties.
- Applies to
- parties
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Original · 17 May 2026
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Applies when evidence is a product of artificial intelligence and is offered without an expert witness but would be subject to Rule 702 if testified to by a witness.
- Requires the proponent to establish helpfulness, sufficient facts or data, reliable principles and methods, and reliable application.
- Ordinarily requires an expert to explain how the AI system reliably produced the evidence, with exceptional circumstances for other proof.
- Makes the evidence admissible only if the proponent gives adverse parties reasonable notice of the intent to offer it.
- The committee decided not to release the revised draft for a new public comment period at that time and planned further AI expert vetting.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2026-05-17 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Proposed Rule 707: Evidence Produced by Artificial Intelligence and Presented at Trial Without an Expert" (Federal Rules of Evidence / Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules, Original, 2026-05-17), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-fre-court-2026-proposed-rule-707 (accessed 2026-09-16). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)