Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Proposed Criminal Local Rule 12.2 Artificial Intelligence
United States District Court for the District of South Dakota · South Dakota
last revised 2025-10-20last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
Court ruleProposedCertificationVerification duty
map categories:Duty to verify AI outputSelf-represented litigants
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
The District of South Dakota public notice dated October 20, 2025, proposes Criminal Local Rule 12.2 on artificial intelligence. The proposed rule requires attorneys and pro se parties to personally review and confirm the accuracy of legal filings, including citations and legal analysis, regardless of whether AI assisted in creating the filing.
- Applies to
- lawyers, litigants, parties
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Original · 20 Oct 2025
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- The public notice states that judges proposed new criminal and civil local rules on artificial intelligence.
- Proposed Criminal LR 12.2 makes attorneys and pro se parties responsible for personally reviewing and confirming filing accuracy.
- The proposed rule covers quotations, citations, paraphrased assertions, legal analysis, and drafting.
- The responsibility applies regardless of whether AI assisted in creating any portion of the filing.
- Noncompliance may trigger sanctions in the presiding judge’s discretion.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2025-10-20 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Proposed Criminal Local Rule 12.2 Artificial Intelligence" (United States District Court for the District of South Dakota, Original, 2025-10-20), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-sdd-court-2025-proposed-criminal-ai-rule (accessed 2026-09-16). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)