Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Judge Goldner Cinquanto’s Policies and Procedures: Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania — Judge Caroline Goldner Cinquanto · Pennsylvania
last revised 2026-09-06last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
Standing orderIn forceDisclosureCertificationVerification duty
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI outputSelf-represented litigants
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Magistrate Judge Caroline Goldner Cinquanto’s policies and procedures require any attorney or pro se party using generative AI to prepare a complaint, answer, motion, brief, or other filed paper to disclose AI use, identify generated portions, identify the specific tool and how it was used, and certify citations to law or record.
- Applies to
- lawyers, litigants
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- As posted (undated) · 06 Sept 2026
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Applies to attorneys and pro se parties using GenAI to prepare filed papers.
- The filer must disclose that GenAI was used to prepare the filing.
- The filer must identify the generated portions and the specific tool used and how it was used.
- The filer must certify every citation to law or the record was verified under Rule 11 obligations.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| As posted (undated)current | 2026-09-06 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Judge Goldner Cinquanto’s Policies and Procedures: Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence" (U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania — Judge Caroline Goldner Cinquanto, As posted (undated), 2026-09-06), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-paed-cinquanto-2026-genai-disclosure-certification (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)