Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Standing Order Regarding the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Court Filings
U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado — Judge Nina Y. Wang · Colorado
last revised 2026-09-06last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
country page →Standing orderIn forceDisclosureCertificationVerification duty
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI output
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Judge Nina Y. Wang’s District of Colorado standing order requires every filing to include an AI certification signed by all drafting contributors. The certification states whether generative AI was used and, if so, confirms human review for accuracy and that all legal citations are real.
- Applies to
- all
- Effective
- 01 Dec 2025
- Current version
- As posted (undated) · 06 Sept 2026
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Every filing must contain an AI certification regarding use or non-use of generative AI.
- The certification must be signed by all individuals who contributed to drafting.
- If AI drafted any language, each contributor must certify human review for accuracy.
- All legal citations must reference actual non-fictitious cases or authority.
- Noncompliant filings may be stricken with leave to refile.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| As posted (undated)current | 2026-09-06 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Standing Order Regarding the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Court Filings" (U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado — Judge Nina Y. Wang, As posted (undated), 2026-09-06), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-cod-wang-2025-ai-certification (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)