CGPJ Instruction 2/2026 on the use of AI systems in judicial activity (Instruccion 2/2026)
General Council of the Judiciary (Consejo General del Poder Judicial)
last revised 2026-01-30last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
RegulationIn forceProhibitionVerification dutyConfidentialitySupervisionPermissive
map categories:Judges' use of AIAI barred from deciding casesCourts' own AI deploymentVendor due diligenceMandatory AI trainingData protection and legal AI
Binding instruction to Spanish judges and magistrates on AI in jurisdictional work: effective human control, no autonomous decision-making or substitution of judicial reasoning, no AI content without personal critical validation, no unapproved tools except study with open sources and no judicial data, full judicial responsibility, CGPJ supervision of personal-data processing and CGPJ-provided training.
- Applies to
- judges, court-staff
- Effective
- 30 Jan 2026
- Current version
- Pleno agreement 28 January 2026, BOE no. 27 of 30 January 2026 (BOE-A-2026-2205) · 30 Jan 2026
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
- Official text
- www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-2026-2205
What the document requires
- Art. 4 principles: effective human control, non-substitution, judicial responsibility, independence, fundamental rights, confidentiality and security, bias prevention, proportionality, training.
- Art. 8 prohibited uses: autonomous decision-making, replacing assessment of facts, evidence or law, incorporating AI content without personal validation, processing specially protected data or profiling beyond legal authorisation.
- Art. 9: only systems supplied by the competent administrations; open tools only for study with open-source information.
- Arts 12-13: CGPJ supervision of personal-data processing and provision of judicial AI training.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pleno agreement 28 January 2026, BOE no. 27 of 30 January 2026 (BOE-A-2026-2205)current | 2026-01-30 | Original; in force on publication. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "CGPJ Instruction 2/2026 on the use of AI systems in judicial activity (Instruccion 2/2026)" (General Council of the Judiciary (Consejo General del Poder Judicial), Pleno agreement 28 January 2026, BOE no. 27 of 30 January 2026 (BOE-A-2026-2205), 2026-01-30), safelegalai.com/regulation/other/es-cgpj-instruccion-2-2026-ia-actividad-jurisdiccional (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in Other
- Letter No. 112/WKMA.Y/HK2.1/IX/2026: draft judgment-writing guidance and templates for the new Criminal Codes · Mahkamah Agung
- AI in the advocate's practice: opportunities, tools and safe use [DI advokato praktikoje: galimybės, įrankiai ir saugus naudojimas] · Lietuvos advokatūra
- Supreme Court of Japan generative-AI demonstration for civil trials (FY2027 budget request) · Supreme Court of Japan
- Recommendation Guide on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers [Avukatlar İçin Yapay Zekâ Kullanımı Tavsiye Rehberi] · Türkiye Barolar Birliği (TBB)
- Decision No. 1671/QD-TTg approving the National Strategy on Artificial Intelligence to 2030, vision to 2045 · Prime Minister of Vietnam
- Guideline on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Indonesian Advocates [Pedoman Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan] · PERADI