Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
GenAI FAQ
United States District Court for the District of Minnesota · Minnesota
last revised 2025-10-01last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
GuidanceIn forcePermissive
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsSelf-represented litigants
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
The District of Minnesota GenAI FAQ, dated October 1, 2025, describes common generative AI litigation uses and limitations. It states that the court does not currently require disclosure of AI use in filings, gives practice pointers on confidentiality and checking research, and reminds litigants that legal, procedural, ethical, and protective-order obligations still apply.
- Applies to
- lawyers, litigants, parties
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Original · 01 Oct 2025
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
- Official text
- www.mnd.uscourts.gov/sites/mnd/files/GenAI_FAQ.pdf
What the document requires
- The FAQ defines generative AI and describes common litigation uses such as legal research, drafting, revision, summarization, translation, and presentations.
- The FAQ states that generative AI cannot check the accuracy of its own responses.
- The District of Minnesota does not currently require disclosure of AI use in court filings.
- The FAQ advises users to avoid entering privileged, confidential, or sensitive information when data may be retained or accessed.
- Users must always use generative AI consistently with ethical obligations, Federal Rules of Civil and Criminal Procedure, and protective orders.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2025-10-01 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "GenAI FAQ" (United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, Original, 2025-10-01), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-mnd-court-2025-genai-faq (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)